If even a fraction of the chatter floating around social feeds and small entertainment outlets is true, the Viking universe as fans know it might be about to split open. Rumors—some loud, some sketchy—are claiming that Netflix has a new project called The Raven’s Oath in which three of Vikings’ most haunted figures—Ragnar Lothbrok, Floki, and Athelstan—reappear under a cloud of myth, judgment, and divine fury. That rumor thread, which has circled through fan pages and short-form videos, has ignited wild speculation about whether this is a sequel, a dark spinoff, or something more metaphysical: a reckoning driven by Odin himself.
A clear caveat up front: major outlets and Netflix’s official channels have not published a definitive announcement about The Raven’s Oath as an official Netflix event (and there’s no authoritative Netflix press page for this title at the time of writing). Much of what’s currently circulating appears on smaller websites and social or video posts, so treat the core claim—Ragnar, Floki, and Athelstan’s canonical return on Netflix—as unconfirmed rumor for now. This article stitches together what’s been reported, what makes sense narratively, and why fans are both thrilled and skeptical.
—
Why this rumor captures the imagination
There are three reasons the idea of The Raven’s Oath instantly hooks viewers:
1. Ragnar’s legend never really left. Even though Vikings moved on from his arc, Ragnar (portrayed by Travis Fimmel) remains central to the franchise’s mythic core—the motif of kingship, hubris, and the thin line between glory and ruin. Travis Fimmel’s performance anchored the series’ emotional gravity and made Ragnar an icon beyond the show.
2. Floki and Athelstan provide the spiritual dialectic. Gustaf Skarsgård’s Floki—eccentric, prophetic, and prone to extremes—is the perfect counterpoint to Ragnar’s cunning and Athelstan’s moral ambivalence. Athelstan (George Blagden) historically represented Christianity’s human face inside Viking culture; his relationship with Ragnar produced some of the series’ most intimate philosophical moments. Reuniting these three threads opens a huge thematic playground.
3. Norse myth is ripe for metaphysical storytelling. Unlike purely political or war-driven sequels, a story that leans into Odin, prophecy, and the gods’ intervention allows Netflix to explore surreal, psychological storytelling—closer to mythic horror than straight historical drama. That tonal shift is precisely what the rumor suggests The Raven’s Oath would attempt: a reckoning, not a retread.
—
What the rumor actually claims (and what’s backed by evidence)
Reports circulating online claim that:
The story centers on a mysterious return or resurrection of Ragnar, with Floki and Athelstan reappearing in ways that blur death and divinity. These reports emphasize that Odin’s wrath is a central driver of the plot, suggesting gods actively meddling in human fate.
The titles and teasers being shared on social platforms present striking visuals—ravens, ruined altars, and dreamlike fjord sequences—pointing to a darker, more mythological aesthetic than Vikings’ earlier seasons.
What we can confirm from reliable records: Travis Fimmel, Gustaf Skarsgård, and George Blagden are indeed the actors originally associated with Ragnar, Floki, and Athelstan, respectively—so if any resurrection or return happens, there’s clear precedent for their portrayals. But crucially: no official Netflix press release or major trade report (Variety, THR, Deadline) has confirmed casting or production details for The Raven’s Oath as of September 8, 2025. Proceed with measured excitement.
—
How a Netflix piece could reframe these characters
Below are narrative possibilities and what they would mean for each character—both emotionally and mythically.
Ragnar: king, ghost, or moral judge?
If Ragnar returns, a few narrative roads open:
Resurrection by the gods: Odin pulls Ragnar from Hel, but not to rule—rather to judge and atone. That would reframe Ragnar’s arc as one of spiritual accountability rather than conquest.
Impostor or vision: Someone (or something) wears Ragnar’s face—testing loyalties and reopening old wounds. This keeps the mystery alive and lets the show interrogate the myth of Ragnar as legend vs. man.
Haunted memory: Ragnar could return as a spectral presence, a force that compels living characters to confront past betrayals and unredeemed sins.
Any of these choices would pivot the franchise toward introspection: Ragnar would be less a warlord and more a catalyst for others’ reckonings.
Floki: prophet, madman, or intermediary?
Floki’s ambiguous relationship with the gods makes him the logical bridge between mortality and divine will. Two interesting routes:
Chosen vessel: Floki believes the gods selected him to mediate Ragnar’s fate—this could flip him into a tragic saint or fanatic.
Punished visionary: Maybe Floki’s eccentricities are punished by Odin’s wrath; his madness is a symptom of divine displeasure or painful insight.
Floki’s arc could anchor the series’ spiritual center, a man whose love and guilt make him both sympathetic and terrifying.
Athelstan: forgiveness, doctrine, or transcendence?
Athelstan’s Christian faith and his bond with Ragnar always offered moral tension. If he returns:
Spiritual ambassador: Athelstan could represent reconciliation—between faiths, or between gods and men.
Mystic rebirth: Perhaps his “return” is not literal but symbolic—a vision that challenges the characters’ understanding of salvation and sin.
Athelstan’s presence would force theological debates into the heart of Viking myth, raising stakes beyond blood and territory.
—
Visuals, tone, and production—what to expect if this is real
The murky images floating online (ravens, fog-veiled altars, dream sequences) point to a few production choices that would make The Raven’s Oath distinct:
Cinematography: dreamlike, saturated in blues and slate grays; heavy use of negative space to create unease.
Design: Norse iconography treated as living language—runes, burial mounds, ravens as active symbols rather than passive motifs.
Music: a score that blends traditional Nordic elements with choral, almost liturgical textures to underline the spiritual conflict.
Pacing: slower, more meditative scenes intercut with intense visions and ritual sequences—think mythic arthouse layered over blockbuster spectacle.
If Netflix leans into high-concept myth rather than action-only epic, the show could tap new audiences beyond historical drama fans. It’s the sort of gamble that streaming platforms occasionally make when they want prestige as well as mass appeal.
—
Fan reaction and the pitfalls of reviving beloved characters
Fans are predictably split. Many are thrilled by the prospect of seeing beloved characters again; others fear cheap nostalgia or alterations to canon.
Potential pitfalls:
Undermining the original stakes. Bringing back characters who died—or were believed dead—can cheapen earlier sacrifices if not handled with a strong narrative justification.
Tone mismatch. A shift to overt supernaturalism could alienate viewers who prefer Viking stories grounded in politics and human drama.
Casting and continuity. If original actors don’t return, fan backlash could be severe; if they do, writing must respect established arcs rather than retconning for shock value.
Handled well, however, a myth-heavy sequel could add depth rather than erase the past. It’s all about narrative consequence: resurrection must carry price and meaning.
—
Theories fans are trading right now
1. Ragnar as Odin’s instrument: Odin resurrects Ragnar not to lead, but to carry a message—a last brutal test before Ragnarok.
2. Athelstan’s role as spiritual disruptor: Athelstan returns (or appears) to expose a moral failing among the new generation of Vikings.
3. Floki as gatekeeper: Floki either welcomes Ragnar back as prophecy fulfilled or stands as the tragic cause of the gods’ anger.
These theories are as much a function of what fans want—closure, spectacle, and philosophical depth—as they are of the rumor’s images and teasers. The lack of firm production details fuels speculation.
—
Bottom line: why this matters (even if it’s a rumor)
Whether The Raven’s Oath becomes a Netflix reality or remains a fan-fueled mirage, the conversation signals something important: viewers crave mythic depth. They want character-driven spectacle that interrogates faith, guilt, and legacy. The idea of Ragnar, Floki, and Athelstan reconvening—either literally or as motifs—promises a story that doesn’t just re-fight old battles but asks what vengeance, forgiveness, and fate mean when gods themselves are angered.
If Netflix does greenlight this project, its success will hinge on respect for the original material and the courage to explore new tonal terrain. If the project is only a rumor, the flood of theories still reveals a hungry audience ready for storytelling that blends history with the numinous.
—
Quick facts & sources (what we relied on)
Social posts, short videos, and small online outlets have circulated the initial claims about The Raven’s Oath and a purported return of Ragnar, Floki, and Athelstan.
A number of social posts and images are being shared across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok—these are the origin-point for most fan excitement but are not by themselves authoritative.
Travis Fimmel, Gustaf Skarsgård, and George Blagden are the actors most commonly associated with Ragnar, Floki, and Athelstan in Vikings. Their historical involvement with the franchise is well documented.
As of September 8, 2025, there is no major Netflix press release or authoritative industry report confirming The Raven’s Oath as an official Netflix production. Readers should treat current reports as unconfirmed.
—
Final thoughts
There’s a particular electricity to the idea of a show where myth reaches in and upends the very people who helped create it. The Raven’s Oath—if it exists—promises not only spectacle but a chance to ask: what happens to heroes when the ledger they wrote against the world is read by gods? That question is why fans are obsessed. For now, keep your expectations tempered: enjoy the teasers and theories, but wait for confirmation from trusted press or Netflix itself before clearing the calendar.
About the Author
